I was fascinated to read about Adam Werbach, an
environmental activist who was recruited to work for Walmart in 2007. Founder of the Sierra Student Coalition, he
joined the retail giant to help them realize their ambitious environmental
goals.
According to the article in Fast Company, many of his former
friends and associates disowned him after his controversial decision, calling
him a traitor, naïve, and even issuing veiled threats.
Though lacking the personal bile of Werbach's former associates, I can respect many people’s skepticism about Walmart’s
sincerity. Despite reading its public goals to eliminate waste and source 100%
renewable energy, I admit that I was dubious myself. Yet, it is hard to deny that something has
changed in Bentonville Arkansas.
For example, Walmart, which boasts the most extensive supply chain
in the world, has increased its fleet fuel efficiency by
69% since it has launched its initiative. It currently sources 28% of its
electricity from renewable sources and has become the nation’s leading
commercial buyer of solar energy. It also has kept 80.9 % of its waste out of landfills.
Using its unequaled retail influence, Walmart has created
the Sustainability Consortium, which has developed a standardized framework,
called Sustainability Measurement & Reporting System(SMRS). SMRS allows
Walmart to rate each of its 100,000 suppliers on their environmental and social
performance. This has the intention of greening the supply chain, and by
affecting companies with revenues of $1.4 trillion, this is perhaps its most
powerful tool for change.
Despite its bold environmental ambitions, its labor
practices remain deplorable. I commend the thousands of Walmart employees who, at risk to
their own jobs, protested the unfair labor practices of their company on Black
Friday. It is my hope that this corporation can begin to see that true
sustainability begins with treating employees with dignity.
The work of Werbach raises an interesting issue for those of
us who may work in the murky moral landscape of corporate America. How does one affect positive environmental
and social change without becoming complicit in systemic injustice that some of
these corporations cause? This is a valid criticism, and one that I have
personally wondered myself.
To better understand this moral question, it was helpful for
me to reframe the issue.
United States’ federal and state governments have been
sources of great inspiration and good for millions at home and abroad. Yet, they also have caused and/or been
complicit in much injustice as well. It
has sanctioned slavery, extermination of Native Americans, imperialism
overseas, oppression of women stateside, and currently, while purporting love
of liberty, possesses the largest prison population in the world. This is the short list.
Yet, most of us see public service is an admirable goal,
even though government through its time has caused great ill. It is understood
that we have responsibility to be a part of the system that we want to change.
At this point, many of you will correctly state that much
social change only took place in America’s history because of strong persistent
agitation by those outside the system.
This is certainly true, yet history has also shown that policy and advocacy
go hand in hand. To change government or
corporations, we need people in both arenas.
People like Werbach.
With estimated annual sales of $447 billion, Walmart is the
largest retailer in the world. If Walmart were a country, its economy would be
the 26th largest in the world, bigger than Austria’s.
Walmart has an opportunity to make an unprecedented impact
on the way the people shop. Its unequaled buying power and ability to pressure
its suppliers make it potent agent for change, if it pointed in the right
direction.
True sustainability has little hope of succeeding if its
only adherents are coastal liberals who drive hybrid cars, support NPR and can
afford to buy from Whole Foods. If sustainability has a future, it must be mainstream
and affordable for the 200 million who shop at Walmart weekly.
I commend Werbach
and others for their commitment and courage, and I hope that they succeed.
John,great post. I really appreciate the fact that you are willing to look at the other side (of Walmart in this case). Something that poses a dilemma similar to public service but is much older is organized religion. We look upon religious men and women as people who have dedicated their lives to a higher cause. Much good comes from religious institutions that provide humanitarian services.And much mischief as well.How many wars have been fought in the name of religion? I love the point about the 'coastal liberals'. We cannot solve our biggest problems by focusing on the 'or'. We need to focus on the 'and'. We need liberals and conservatives. Believers and atheists. Rich and Poor. Red states and Blue states. And on and on.
ReplyDelete